Kevin Mandrick · Published Jun 10, 2026 · Last reviewed Jun 9, 2026
A CE mark on a higher-risk medical device is easy to read as proof the device itself is compliant. It isn't quite that. It first carries the manufacturer's own declaration of conformity — and above general Class I (and for Class I devices that are sterile, have a measuring function, or are reusable surgical instruments), that declaration rests on a notified-body certificate: documentary evidence that an independent, designated body assessed the manufacturer's conformity demonstration — a quality-management system, or a device's technical documentation, depending on the certificate type. EUDAMED is where those certificates surface — the notified body, the manufacturer, the evaluation type, the validity period, and the status — data that used to be hard to find. Reading one well is a core skill for anyone in regulatory affairs, quality, or procurement.
As of June 2026, MD Atlas has indexed 1,553 notified-body certificates from EUDAMED — an indexed subset of the public data at that date, not an exhaustive count of EUDAMED. It is enough to illustrate every concept below and to cross-check the manufacturers and devices those certificates cover. Every figure here comes from a live MD Atlas query you can re-run, read against that indexing scope.
Under the Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 and the IVDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/746), a notified body issues a certificate once a conformity-assessment procedure within its remit concludes favourably. Annex XII of the MDR sets out the minimum content of an MDR certificate (the IVDR carries its own equivalent annex); the EUDAMED record lets you verify several things:
Each of those is a question a reviewer should be able to answer in seconds, and together they tell you whether a device's compliance basis is currently sound.
Not every certificate means the same thing. A quality-management-system certificate attests that the manufacturer's QMS was evaluated favourably against the applicable requirements — not that every device was assessed individually; a technical-documentation or type-examination certificate covers a specific device, family, or technical scope. A manufacturer can hold a valid QMS certificate while a particular product line's technical documentation is still under assessment. Reading the type — not just the presence — of a certificate is what separates a meaningful check from a box-ticking one.
This is also where the MDR's transition rules bite. Under Article 120 of the MDR — its transitional provisions, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2023/607 — many devices may still be marketed under legacy certificates carried over from the previous directives, and the conditions attached to those certificates differ from a fresh MDR certificate. When you read a certificate, always anchor it to the regulation it was issued under, and check the conditions for its validity.
The status field is the fastest signal — but read it against the certificate's scope: a suspension or withdrawal can affect only part of what a certificate covers.
A suspended or withdrawn certificate on a device you are about to buy, specify, or distribute is exactly the finding worth verifying directly in EUDAMED — its scope, the device, the framework, and whether a renewal exists.
The official portal lets you look up a certificate if you already know what you are looking for. In practice, a quality, regulatory-affairs, or procurement reviewer usually starts from the manufacturer or the device and works toward the certificate:
Working in this direction — manufacturer, device, certificate — mirrors how compliance actually hangs together, and it surfaces situations worth verifying: a high-risk device with no live certificate, a certificate whose scope doesn't seem to match the device, or one issued under an earlier regulatory framework — things a single point lookup would miss.
For quality, regulatory-affairs, and vigilance teams, a certificate isn't a static checkbox. Its status can change — through surveillance audits, non-conformities, suspensions, withdrawals, or renewals — and those changes ripple into post-market obligations. Treated as a living signal rather than a one-time check, the certificate data recorded in EUDAMED can contribute to regulatory surveillance, supply-risk analysis, and continued conformity — read alongside the certificate's scope and what the manufacturer holds.
A notified-body certificate isn't an absolute guarantee to read in isolation. It is a useful entry point: who evaluated the manufacturer or device, on what scope, under which framework, and whether that evaluation still stands today. Learn to read it well, and a great deal of regulatory uncertainty collapses into a few seconds of checking.

Pharmacist — Quality Management Systems, Regulatory Conformity, Clinical Surveillance & Health Vigilance